Facebook changes privacy options

23 August 2011 Last updated at 18:14 GMT Facebook users will be asked to approve any postings that they are tagged in Facebook has announced a major revamp of how users control their privacy on the site.

Among the changes, items posted online will each have their own sharing settings determining who can see them.

It is the latest in a long line of attempts by Facebook to streamline how members manage their personal information.

In the past, the social network has been criticised for seeming to bury privacy settings in obscure menus.

Postings will have their own unique privacy settings

Now when users are tagged in a posting - such as a photograph or video - they will have the option to confirm or remove their identity before it appears on their profile.

It is hoped the safeguard will eliminate the problem of malicious tagging, which is often used by cyberbullies who add other people's names to unpleasant images.

Other changes include:

In line controls - each item on a user's wall has individual privacy options, such as public, friends and customTag takedown - the ability to remove tags of self, ask the person who tagged you to remove it, or block the taggerUniversal tagging - users can tag anyone, not just Facebook friends. Other person can choose not to accept the tagged post on their profile Location tagging - geographic locations can be added in all versions of Facebook, not just mobile appProfile view - the option to see how others view your profile is added above the news feed

Facebook's vice-president of product, Chris Cox said that the arrival of another privacy refresh did not necessarily mean the old system was confusing.

"I don't think the old controls were bad. I just think the new ones are much better," he told BBC News.

"The goal is just to make [the settings] more inline and more immediate, just right there in the profile."

Users can ask for tags of them to be removed or have the content deleted completely

Mr Cox also played down suggestions that Facebook might be improving its privacy controls as it prepares to extend access to children under 13 - something its founder Mark Zuckerberg has said he would like to see.

"This change is really just about the people that are on Facebook today and the new users who just joined today and making it easier for them.

"This really is not in any way about the under-13 experience," said Mr Cox.

He promised there would not be any unexpected changes to users' privacy settings during the changeover process.

Existing users will retain their current default sharing settings.

The first time new Facebook members share a piece of content, their default suggestion will be public - which replaces the "everyone" setting. If users select another option, that will become their default in future.

The new privacy options will begin to be rolled out across the site from Thursday 25 August.

View the original article here

Row over prescription changes

8 April 2011 Last updated at 23:01 GMT By Bob Howard Reporter, Money Box Some GPs have been told they should prescribe medicines for 28 not 56 days GPs say they are coming under pressure from Primary Care Trusts (PCT) to reduce the amount of drugs supplied per prescription.

In some cases this means patients in England getting 28 days' supply instead of 56, doubling the prescription cost.

The Patients Association reports a rise in the number of calls to its helpline, and warns that some people may not be able to afford the rise.

The Department of Health said GPs were not obliged to follow PCT guidelines.

Many people who need long-term medication are used to getting prescriptions for their medicine that will last them two months. It keeps the costs down for England patients who still have to pay and means they do not have to keep visiting their surgery.

Hazel from London relies on regular medication to reduce her cholesterol levels. She had a shock when she went to collect her latest prescription, and was told she could only have 28 pills instead of 56:

"I went to pick up a regular prescription. There was a note attached to it which said that this initiative which allowed me less pills was down to the local Primary Care Trust."

Hazel was upset that this change had come hard on the heels of prescription charges in England rising to £7.40 per item.

"I feel it's unjust. This means the prescription charge has gone up by 100%."

Hard choices

Hazel is not alone in being alarmed by this change in policy by some Primary Care Trusts. The Patients Association says it is receiving calls to its helpline from others complaining of similar rises.

Dr Mike Smith, an Association trustee, says forcing patients to buy more prescriptions for their condition could have serious consequences:

"I know from pharmacists that quite often the patient will say I'll do without that one and that one this month because I can't afford it. Now that is not right."

The Department of Health insists that although Primary Care Trusts can issue guidelines on the amount of drugs GPs prescribe, it is up to the individual GP whether he or she wants to follow them.

Continue reading the main story

A parliamentary accounts committee estimated something like £100 million a year is wasted on medicines.”

End Quote David Stout Director, Primary Care Trust Network Hazel's Primary Care Trust, NHS Enfield, admits it changed its guidance to GPs in January but insists doctors were not obliged to follow it. When Hazel phoned the Trust on the advice of her GP, it said she would was able to get her 56 day prescription again after all.

Saving waste

The body that represents the trusts is the Primary Care Trust Network. David Stout, the PCT Network's director, says its members are not reducing the quantity of drugs prescribed as an indiscriminate way of cutting costs:

"The idea is to avoid waste. A parliamentary accounts committee estimated something like £100 million a year is wasted on medicines that never get used. "

But some of those writing the prescriptions wonder whether these new policies have been adequately thought through.

Dr Bill Beeby is the chairman of the clinical and prescribing committee at the British Medical Association and a GP in Middlesborough.

He believes his colleagues are coming under pressure to reduce prescriptions from 56 to 28 days, but in many cases no savings are being made at all:

"I can understand why practices are complying with PCTs because they're under considerable pressure to do so. But if patients are fully compliant with taking their medication and it is regularly taken and regularly needed then it saves absolutely no money."

The Department of Health says people requiring regular prescriptions in England who are not exempt can apply for a Prescriptions Prepayment Certificate. It costs £104 a year.

View the original article here

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.